Um, yeah. Just what is so horrifying about pretty 39-yr-old Faith Hill, pray tell?
Here she is looking like a very pretty person.
And here she is looking like a shiny person w/ no lines on her body, no bones, really, and a really weird, very skinny, very long arm. She's not even the same color. Needless to say, I prefer Faith Hill in the original. My back ONLY curves in like that when I'm concentrating reallllllly hard during yoga.Redbook sucks.








Rather deceptive, eh, ae?
Posted by: David | Tuesday, 17 July 2007 at 10:43 PM
David, I wonder why there aren't laws against this -- against misrepresentation or the like? I mean, it's a fraud, and it has disastrous effects. It is not (as noted in the Baldwin post above) innocent in the least.
Posted by: arse poetica | Wednesday, 18 July 2007 at 05:44 PM
It looks freakish when you see the two. I had never known what to look for before. Now I will watch for things like her back. Even her hair is blonder. Really is sick when a so called women's magazine has to air brush women. Maybe that helps them sell all the beauty products they have inside the pages.
Posted by: Laura | Monday, 10 March 2008 at 06:13 PM