Two recent stories just make my hair stand on end.
1. Title IX Protection Under Attack Again:
What's not to like about the 1972 federal law that outlaws discrimination on the basis of gender, opened the playing fields of this country to girls, not just boys, and survived every single court challenge it has faced the past three decades?
Bush administration officials have been under heavy criticism since the U.S. Department of Education quietly released a surprise legal clarification on its Web site Friday advising colleges that, for the first time, they can remain in compliance with Title IX based on an e-mail survey of their undergraduate students designed to gauge "interest and ability" in sports. If the responses do not show enough interest - and what exactly constitutes enough has yet to be determined - then an institution can go ahead and presume it is in compliance.
Imagine that. There'll be no more pesky need to compare an athletic department's spending outlays or scholarships offered for men versus women. The burden will be on the students to enforce the law, not the universities.
Schools also have been told they can count an unreturned survey as a lack of interest. Which means one of the most effective federal laws on the books, a measure that resulted in an eight-fold boom in girls' participation in sports, can be undercut if one too many 19-year-old co-eds merely forgets in a blur of classes and keg parties and homework assignments to open, download, answer and return an e-mail survey that, right now, numbers eight Web pages.
Keep reading. The denouncements of this "policy" by B*sh's own hand-picked review committee are worth it. I could go on for a year-and-a-half about how this madministration clearly hates women, but I'll let this -- an attack on one of the most successful pieces of legislation this country has ever conceived -- speak for itself. Damn B*sh straight to hell. Wake up, Republican soccer moms. Less opportunity for your Britneys and Kayleighs and Madisons.
Diane at DED Space has a nice post on Congresswoman Patsy Takemoto Mink, who helped to write the original Title IX legislation. Sending a (post-mortem) valentine Patsy's way.
2. Michigan Preparing to Let Doctors Refuse to Treat Gays:
Doctors or other health care providers could not be disciplined or sued if they refuse to treat gay patients under legislation passed Wednesday by the Michigan House.
The bill allows health care workers to refuse service to anyone on moral, ethical or religious grounds.
The Republican dominated House passed the measure as dozens of Catholics looked on from the gallery. The Michigan Catholic Conference, which pushed for the bills, hosted a legislative day for Catholics on Wednesday at the state Capitol.
The bills now go the Senate, which also is controlled by Republicans.
The Conscientious Objector Policy Act would allow health care providers to assert their objection within 24 hours of when they receive notice of a patient or procedure with which they don't agree. However, it would prohibit emergency treatment to be refused.
Three other three bills that could affect LGBT health care were also passed by the House Wednesday which would exempt a health insurer or health facility from providing or covering a health care procedure that violated ethical, moral or religious principles reflected in their bylaws or mission statement.
Opponents of the bills said they're worried they would allow providers to refuse service for any reason. For example, they said an emergency medical technicians could refuse to answer a call from the residence of gay couple because they don't approve of homosexuality.
The Conscientious Objector Bill? Oh no, they didn't. What galling, hateful, manipulative f*ckers these assholes are. I hope all of the he's-not-so-bad, B*sh is a moral man, he's a compassionate
conservative (sic), bullshit loving Republican idiots are happy tearing down the democratic fabric of this country stitch by stitch. And as for the apathetic, non-voting,
there's-no-difference-between-the-parties dolts, welcome to your theocracy. Are you paying
attention now? Could deTocqueville have guessed a tyranny of the minority?
I am loath to bandy the N-word about, but this is tantamount to N-zi tactics: targeting a population for discrimination, the extermination portion just slightly more circuitous -- refusing people medical care could, you know, lead to their deaths. When will the pink triangles come out? Really. Will the medical records of gay patients be "marked" in some way, lest some "ethical, moral, or religious" "doctor" be so offended by inadvertantly following the oath of service on which his entire profession is founded? My God. Every single day something more appalling than the day before.
I just can't fathom the world we live in anymore. What fresh hell is this? People can actually get into medical school, undergo 7 years of training, and come out of that experience with a whole panoply of prejudices which, instead of being rejected as ass-backward and unlearned, will be protected by law by a passel of Republican moralist vermin in Michigan? So we'll protect prejudice and prejudice protection? I mean, seriously? Tell me this is just a terrible nightmare. We should be rioting. At the very least we should be waking up.
[Comics from Sam at explodingdog.]